Showing posts with label Emily Blunt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emily Blunt. Show all posts

Monday, October 1, 2012

Flute Loop-er - Movies Rock the Nation.

And we're back again with gloriously bare film critiques.  This past weekend, there was Looper.  It was a movie.  People really seem to enjoy it.  Personally though, the one thing I noted when the film was discussed was the parallels with the film Drive  that were being made.  Yes, both films shared a similar release schedule, both were pot boilers, as my grandmother may have called the, and most strikingly, neither film is the one advertised to you.

As Drive was advertised, and notably litigated against, it was to be a taught, um driving centric, action film.  That movie though, should have been given the far more accurate sobriquet of CurbStomp or Elevator Beatings or Ryan Gosling is Beat Takeshi in etc.  The same is true of Looper.  It is not so much a time faring action thriller in the form of a literal battle of one's self, but a well crafted meditation on causality, with time travel.  Unfortunately though, it is impossible really to discuss some of the movie's finer points without totally excavating the movies twists and finer points.  So, in brief, I cannot in good conscience tell you not to see the movie.  It's worth the movie dollar.  It has an interesting presence, solid performances, and it does some terribly nifty things with time travel in the first half.  However, here is what I can say negatively.  The second half features a plodding, languid pacing to it that I found to be wholly disengaging, as the eventual reveals (relating to the well everyt6hing is spoiler redacted) are ungodly predictable.  I mean I can't say who is doing what and how and why but you will know how it plays out when that starts.  One would not need to ruminate on narrative structure to figure out the whys and hows; it just is.  That's really it.  So, pretty much in summation: totally worth the money, has a great taut introduction, then proceeds to not simmer during the second half, nor boil over; it just is.  Then it ends, and you're like that was pretty cool I guess.  Not the movie I thought I was paying to see, but still a solid flick.  Also, you get used to the Joseph Gordon Levitt prosthetics, and they didn't really take me out of things.  So, yes, Looper pretty good; fire bad.